God is the Great Whatever. God is “un-getable” — we just can’t “get” the idea of God like we get algebra or something. Yeah.
I like this lady’s use of words. And yeah also to her plan to talk about our partnerships with God, not argue about what we have decided He/She/It is like. Her new discussion sounds worth joining. — +Katia
By Martha Woodroof
April 30, 2010
I am a person of faith who is not religious. By this I mean that while IÂ live in partnership with God, the great Whatever, I claim no knowledge ofÂ God’s relatives, nature and modus operandi. I believe that everything aboutÂ God beyond the simple fact of Its existence and availability is beyond myÂ understanding and so beyond the scope of my words. I make no claim to wisdomÂ of any kind about God, only to experience with God.
That’s why I decided to start Faith Unboxed ,Â which I hope will be an unconventional online conversation about livingÂ one’s faith rather than practicing (or preaching) one’s religion. I’d muchÂ rather talk about how we experience God than argue about what we haveÂ decided about God, wouldn’t you?
As I’m not a pundit, a preacher, or a scholar, deciding to host such aÂ faith-centric conversation about the great Whatever leaves me wide open toÂ charges of uppityness. What’s the deal here, lady? You think you get God andÂ the rest of us don’t? Not exactly: What I think is that a) God isÂ intrinsically un-getable; and b) most of our current conversation about GodÂ and God’s doings ignores this, conflating practicing one’s religion andÂ living one’s faith.
God, the great Whatever, is ubiquitous in American thinking, society,Â politics, literature, architecture, conversation — even, throughÂ quarterback Tim Tebow’s facial paint in college football. I would wagerÂ heavily that none of us escapes growing up without a kissing concept of theÂ great Whatever–some idea implanted in our brains by our elders about whatÂ we’re supposed to believe or not believe about God’s presence, doings,Â relatives, etc. As adults, we may decide to accept those ideas, modify them,Â rebel against them, or turn our backs on the whole confusing mishmash. ButÂ we have all most likely decided something about God.
What we don’t often do as adults — whether because we lack inclination orÂ courage or imagination — is to acknowledge that God, in order to be God,Â exists completely detached from any human conception of God. The greatÂ Whatever is only what the great Whatever is, not what our parents, pundits,Â preachers or priests say It is. Or for that matter, what they say It isn’t.
So . . . with all due respect, it seems to me desperately wasteful, arrogantÂ and cowardly for us humans to argue so much about religion — i.e. ourÂ human-sized conceptions of God’s aforementioned relatives, nature and modusÂ operandi. Missing from most of these battles is any recognition that if GodÂ is, God is also beyond our comprehension. We can never know about God in theÂ same way we know about chickens or algebra or documented history; elaborateÂ and compelling religious stories explaining God and God’s family are stillÂ stories. Insisting that these stories are true, or even integral parts ofÂ our relationship with God, seems to me to confuse the value of acceptingÂ what humans have said about God with the value of living in partnership withÂ God.
Arguing about God is, of course, much less troublesome and anxiety-provokingÂ than taking on the demands and responsibilities of a partnership with theÂ Almighty. Indeed, the challenges of any organized religion (or those otherÂ God-in-a-box concepts, atheism and agnosticism) begin to seem likeÂ effortless glides on greased grooves when compared to the challenges ofÂ living one’s faith. Perhaps that’s why there’s been a great deal of publicÂ wrangling about the fine points of religion and very little useful publicÂ exploration of what it means to live and work together — in this world atÂ this time — as persons of faith.
I hope this online conversation starts such an exploration. I challenge youÂ to join me in thinking beyond everything we’ve come to accept about theÂ great Whatever through habit, upbringing, learned ritual and doctrine. IÂ challenge us, instead, to explore afresh the meaning and responsibilities ofÂ faith, of living in active partnership with God, both as an individual andÂ in community. And I challenge us to do this exploration fearlessly, withÂ uncensored curiosity and open-mindedness.
To give our conversation structure, over the next 12 months, I’ll post aÂ dozen questions (one each month) along with my own short (for the most part)Â answers. My hope is that you will post your own answers and then respond toÂ each others’ posts. Civility and respect are the only criteria forÂ participation. This means no talk of burning in hell or scholarly howls ofÂ derision.
Join me here at On Faith the first Sunday of each month for a look at theÂ question. Join me every day at Faith Unboxed for the discussion. Is itÂ possible to have an open, useful and civil online conversation about faith,Â not religion? We shall see.
Martha Woodroof freelances for NPR and writes, reports, and blogs for publicÂ radio station WMRA in Virginia.