{"id":509,"date":"2011-05-12T20:19:59","date_gmt":"2011-05-13T03:19:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/?p=509"},"modified":"2011-05-12T20:19:59","modified_gmt":"2011-05-13T03:19:59","slug":"the-arrogance-of-spiritual-but-not-religious","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/?p=509","title":{"rendered":"The arrogance of Spiritual but not Religious"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yeah. I agree with Ken Wilber here (below). I have always thought we can be both spiritual AND religious. Why does religion get a bad rap &#8212; well, we all know why, because &#8220;sellers&#8221; and &#8220;enforcers&#8221; of organized religion have abused humanity. \u00c2\u00a0But religion, RELIGION itself is way cool. It&#8217;s my field, so okay, I am biased. In our seminary application process we always require new minister candidates to write the story of religion AND spirituality in their life from childhood to present.<\/p>\n<p>From philosopher Ken Wilber&#8217;s forum:<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s become quite a trend in the integral community to describe oneself as &#8220;spiritual but not religious.&#8221; In light of our shared integral spiritual vision, It certainly makes sense that folks like us would define ourselves in a way that is opposed to folks like them. Who&#8217;s them? Well you know, those mythic literalists with their fundamentalist religion. But, from another perspective, don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s a bit awkward for us so-called integral types to describe what we are by disaffirming an opposite? And, what&#8217;s with all this us and them talk? Is that not a hallmark of absolutistic thinking? Doesn&#8217;t this reek of the same conformist cognition that fuels the fundamentalist fervor we&#8217;re so sure we have nothing in common with? Instead of so strongly insisting that we&#8217;re oh-so-spiritual&#8211;but oh-no religion!&#8211;what would it mean to be both spiritual and religious?<\/p>\n<p>In this talk, Ken outlines two required steps for bringing religion and spirituality into greater accord. He&#8217;s guided by a vision of a fully functional and healthy religion\u00e2\u20ac\u201done which institutionalizes a care and concern for spiritual intelligence that grows in two directions: waking-up and growing-up. On the waking-up side of the street, he envisions the return of state-stage cultivation, accomplished by resurrecting and re-engaging the contemplative practices of the early christian fathers. And on the growing-up side, he calls for a busting of the mythic ceiling\u00e2\u20ac\u201da move that loosens and lubricates development along the spiral of spiritual intelligence, and which results in 2000-year-old myths being reinterpreted at higher levels. If these steps are acted in consort, Ken foresees religion as regaining a functional capacity to address human development through states and structures. And if not, folks like us\u00e2\u20ac\u201dfolks who deeply yearn for a post-mythic approach\u00e2\u20ac\u201dwill likely retain our status as &#8220;spiritual but not religious.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/integrallife.com\/node\/87135<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yeah. I agree with Ken Wilber here (below). I have always thought we can be both spiritual AND religious. Why does religion get a bad rap &#8212; well, we all know why, because &#8220;sellers&#8221; and &#8220;enforcers&#8221; of organized religion have abused humanity. \u00c2\u00a0But religion, RELIGION itself is way cool. It&#8217;s my field, so okay, I &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/?p=509\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The arrogance of Spiritual but not Religious<\/span><\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-misc"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=509"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/509\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":511,"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/509\/revisions\/511"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.northernway.org\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}